Category: Space

Harvard Scientists Theorize That Fast Radio Bursts Come From Alien Space Travel

 

Isn’t it awesome!! Could be Aliens.

 

https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/news/2017-09

 

Could Fast Radio Bursts Be Powering Alien Probes?
Release No.:
2017-09
For Release:
Thursday, March 9, 2017 – 11:00am

The search for extraterrestrial intelligence has looked for many different signs of alien life, from radio broadcasts to laser flashes, without success. However, newly published research suggests that mysterious phenomena called fast radio bursts could be evidence of advanced alien technology. Specifically, these bursts might be leakage from planet-sized transmitters powering interstellar probes in distant galaxies.

“Fast radio bursts are exceedingly bright given their short duration and origin at great distances, and we haven’t identified a possible natural source with any confidence,” said theorist Avi Loeb of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. “An artificial origin is worth contemplating and checking.”

As the name implies, fast radio bursts are millisecond-long flashes of radio emission. First discovered in 2007, fewer than two dozen have been detected by gigantic radio telescopes like the Parkes Observatory in Australia or the Arecibo Observatory in Puerto Rico. They are inferred to originate from distant galaxies, billions of light-years away.

Loeb and his co-author Manasvi Lingam (Harvard University) examined the feasibility of creating a radio transmitter strong enough for it to be detectable across such immense distances. They found that, if the transmitter were solar powered, the sunlight falling on an area of a planet twice the size of the Earth would be enough to generate the needed energy. Such a vast construction project is well beyond our technology, but within the realm of possibility according to the laws of physics.

Lingam and Loeb also considered whether such a transmitter would be viable from an engineering perspective, or whether the tremendous energies involved would melt any underlying structure. Again, they found that a water-cooled device twice the size of Earth could withstand the heat.

They then asked, why build such an instrument in the first place? They argue that the most plausible use of such power is driving interstellar light sails. The amount of power involved would be sufficient to push a payload of a million tons, or about 20 times the largest cruise ships on Earth.

“That’s big enough to carry living passengers across interstellar or even intergalactic distances,” added Lingam.

To power a light sail, the transmitter would need to focus a beam on it continuously. Observers on Earth would see a brief flash because the sail and its host planet, star and galaxy are all moving relative to us. As a result, the beam sweeps across the sky and only points in our direction for a moment. Repeated appearances of the beam, which were observed but cannot be explained by cataclysmic astrophysical events, might provide important clues about its artificial origin.

Loeb admits that this work is speculative. When asked whether he really believes that any fast radio bursts are due to aliens, he replied, “Science isn’t a matter of belief, it’s a matter of evidence. Deciding what’s likely ahead of time limits the possibilities. It’s worth putting ideas out there and letting the data be the judge.”

The paper reporting this work has been accepted for publication in the Astrophysical Journal Letters and is available online.

Headquartered in Cambridge, Mass., the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics (CfA) is a joint collaboration between the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory and the Harvard College Observatory. CfA scientists, organized into six research divisions, study the origin, evolution and ultimate fate of the universe.

When I shine a flashlight at Mars, does a small amount of the light actually reach it? Reddit delivers

Okay:

[–]somedave 4341 points 23 hours ago*
Yes, you need to be careful with phrases like “a small amount”.
Mars is around 225 million km away at closest approach average distance. Lets say you have a 1W flashlight and aim it at Mars, the intensity very far away from this flashlight will drop off as the distance squared (also a little extra from absorption and scattering in the atmosphere). Without doing any exact calculations, if we assume scattering is negligible we can say the intensity that hits Mars will be larger than
I > 1W / (2 pi * (225 million km)2) ~ 3 × 10-24 W /m2
Mars has a surface area of 144.8 million km², so the power hitting Mars will be around
I * A/4 ~ 2.3 × 10-10 W
This isn’t a lot of power, but a single photon at optical wavelengths has an energy of around 3 × 10-19 J, so this is still billions of photons a second hitting Mars.
Edit: Lots of people are pointing out the beam divergence and scattering I ignored. Scattering I still don’t think is very significant, about a fraction 10−5 of the light will be scattered for every meter of travel, most of earths atmosphere is within 20 km of the surface so the intensity is reduced by a factor of around
I/I_0 = exp(-20000*10-5) ~ 0.8
which is a 20% loss and thus not significant. If you aimed the beam through more atmosphere or if you had a blue flashlight this gets worse, but never significant.
The beam divergence depends heavily on how wide a flashlight you have to start with, if you had something which is quite compact the divergence is worse than something with a large output. Most of the power is actually in a spherical segment which is, say, 30 degrees in size, where as my calculation assumed this was closer to 90 degrees. To compensate the intensity on Mars would be bigger by a factor of (90/30)2 = 9 ~ 10.

Hi, How are you doing?

Saturn popping out from behind the moon to ask if we’re all okay.

 

.

.

View post on imgur.com

 

.

I am good, thanks.

…….
.
.
.
npjprods
What’s the focal length this was shot at? Would a 300mm suffice?

From The New York Times:

An Expensive View (but Hardly Expansive) of New York City

They say using the 1,200-millimeter lens is like looking at the world through a straw, so a reporter and photographer decided to find out.

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/06/29/nyregion/an-intimate-view-of-new-york-through-a-1200-millimeter-lens.html

.
.
.
.

.

It seems I have a foot fetish for robots in general – Mars Curiosity Rover – Wheel Wear and Tear, and a Rocker-bogie for kicks

.
.


.
via olafwillocx
.. these tires aren’t the tires we’re used to. These are aluminum tires. Very thin aluminum too, to save weight. The parts that are damaged are only 0.75 mm thick. The treads for grip are 7.5 mm thick.
.
.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rocker-bogie#/media/File:Rocker_bogie.gif

.

.

There were several factors that drove them to design the wheels to be as lightweight as possible. The large size of the wheels means that very slight design changes add a substantial amount of mass. Increasing wheel thickness by one millimeter would add 10 kilograms to the rover’s total mass. But total system mass wasn’t the only constraint. Erickson explained that a major constraint arose from a tricky moment in the landing sequence, at the moment that the wheels deployed, while the rover was suspended from the bridle underneath the descent stage. The wheels’ sudden drop imparted substantial forces on the mobility system, and keeping wheel mass as light as possible reduced those forces to manageable ones. There were other factors that made it important to keep wheel mass low.

So the wheels needed to be as light as possible while still being able to do their job, but as to their job: “We misunderstood what Mars was,” Erickson said. “Strongly cemented ventifacts are not something that we saw on Mars before.” They designed Curiosity to handle all the challenges that Spirit and Opportunity had experienced, especially sand, which Curiosity traverses substantially better than her predecessors. “This vehicle is able to get itself out of situations that MER couldn’t; it’s got more flotation than MER had by a substantial margin.” They designed Curiosity to handle the sand traps, flat bedrock, and rocks-perched-on-sand landscapes seen by all the previous landers. They just didn’t imagine the possibility of the peculiar and never-before-seen terrain type that they found in Gale crater. “There are [places] on Earth that do have these sharp ventifacts, but we hadn’t seen them on Mars and we didn’t test against them,” Erickson said.” Source: http://www.planetary.org/blogs/emily-lakdawalla/2014/08190630-curiosity-wheel-damage.html

So yeah, aluminium because of the light weight and flexibility. Wheel skin is only .75mm thick. It would have worked if it probably just driving around in sand but it wasn’t. I don’t think metal choice was the issue but the wheel design in general. Such a thin wheel skin with most metals could surely be destroyed after driving over such things. It just sounds like a design failure to me.

.

.

.

via paulhammond5155 

Routine Inspection of Curiosity’s Wheel Wear and Tear:

The team operating Curiosity Rover use the Mars Hand Lens Imager (MAHLI) camera on the 2 meter-long robotic arm to check the condition of the wheels at routine intervals. This image of Curiosity’s right-middle and right-rear wheels is part of an inspection set of 20 images taken during mission sol 1591 (27th January 2017). A link is provided to all of the raw MAHLI images acquired during that inspection below.

Holes and tears in the wheels worsened significantly during 2013 as Curiosity was crossing terrain studded with sharp rocks on its route from near its 2012 landing site to the base of Mount Sharp. JPL engineering team members are keeping a close eye for when any of the zig-zag shaped treads, call grousers, begin to break. Longevity testing with identical wheels on Earth indicates that when three grousers on a given wheel have broken, that wheel has reached about 60 percent of its useful mileage. Curiosity’s current odometry of 15.34 kilometers 9.53 miles, and with no grousers broken so far. The accumulating damage to wheels is not expected to prevent the rover from reaching its predetermined mission science destinations on the slopes of Mount Sharp.

Curiosity’s six aluminum wheels are about 50 centimeters (20 inches) in diameter and 40 centimeters (16 inches) wide. Each of the six wheels has its own drive motor, and the four corner wheels also have steering motors. The MAHLI image attached has been rotated, colour adjusted and sharpened, it’s also been annotated with the wheel dimensions and the location of the Morse code cut-outs in its wheels, these leave visual odometry marks in rover tracks in sand, which are useful for checking the drive distances reported by the rover. Curiosity’s six aluminum wheels are about 50 centimeters (20 inches) in diameter and 40 centimeters (16 inches) wide. Each of the six wheels has its own drive motor, and the four corner wheels also have steering motors enabling the rover to perform 360 degree turns in place.

Image Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/MSSS

All of the MAHLI images for sol 1591:

http://mars.nasa.gov/msl/multimedia/raw/?s=1591&camera=MAHLI.

.